Latest Posts

May 16, 2013

Eying Ethnic Cleansing from the Sky

Google Maps is an amazing tool. Followers of this blog will know it is a tool I utilize a great deal since so much of the issues we deal with are geographic. When it comes to understanding the Nakba though, Google Maps provides a whole new view which I have been sharing with followers over twitter in recent days and will continue to do so this week as we commemorate the depopulation of Palestine from the majority of its native inhabitants.

Thanks to the work of geographers and historians, we have geographic coordinates for Palestinian villages which were destroyed during the depopulation of Palestine. This allows us to see precisely where the villages were through Google's satellite imagery and what that area looks like today. Another fascinating Google tool is "Street View" which, as you can imagine, allows you to see the view of the area from the street. Now not every street level view is available but many are. A feature of street view includes photos taken and uploaded by individuals with recorded geo-positions off the roads.

In some cases villages were completely destroyed with little physical evidence remaining. In many other cases, however, some structures from the villages still stand or village land is visibly strewn with rubble from the destroyed homes. I've been using the street view tool to tweet images of these remains, which I call the "Ghosts of the Nakba", standing there, often in plain site, as a haunting reminder of a crime perpetuated against the villages and their people.

Google Maps also allows the opportunity to make an interesting juxtaposition in many cases. For hundreds of villages, high-quality aerial imagery of the village exists from before the Nakba. So we can take this imagery and put it next to Google's satellite imagery of the area today. Take for example, the Palestinian village of Burayr where some 3,000 Palestinians lived before the ethnic cleansing. The before and after shot below shows how Burayr was wiped off the map.




The before image, on the left, shows a village packed with stone houses. The Google Maps image on the right (which you can see here) shows a clearly discernible outline of where the village was. The odd shape contrasts with the square plots surrounding it and, despite being sparsely covered with trees today some of the old village roads are faintly discernible as well. These shapes marking villages, which don't quite fit in with the surroundings, are clearly visible in a number of cases like Julis, Beit Jibrin, Maghar,  Tal Ubayda, Damun, and many others.

The Ghosts of the Nakba are all around and you will notice them quite easily if you are looking and know where to look. As Moshe Dayan, a former Israeli Defense Minister and Army Chief of Staff  said "There isn't any place that was established in an area where there had not at one time been an Arab settlement." Of course, he should know, since he played a role in the depopulation.

Despite this many Israelis do not see the ghosts before them in plain site. Or perhaps, they don't want to see them. Early this morning and in response to a Ghost of the Nakba tweet I sent about Kafr Saba, Barak Ravid, an journalist for the Israeli Daily Haaretz replied:




He has since deleted this tweet.

Of course, Kafr Saba did exist. It doesn't today. But it was located right here. You can see an odd area in brown which stands out because it literally looks like something had been there before being erased from sight. That was Kfar Saba.

Ravid noted he had been mistaken after several tweeters informed him he was wrong. But this begs the question, just how much do Israelis actually know, or care to know, about the society that was destroyed to make way for the state they live in today? How much do they know or care to know about the Ghosts of the Nakba all around them? How can they not but feel responsibility for the dismembering of a society, a dismemberment that continues today in the West Bank?

If they or anyone else is interested, Google Maps is one place to start and get a bird's eye view of the ethnic cleansing that took place. As long as, well you know, you're not afraid of confront some ghosts.

read more...

Apr 3, 2013

NY Times Watch: Israeli Violations Cease to Exist cc @Sulliview

After the truce that came into effect between Israel and groups in Gaza brokered by Egypt last November, we began to keep a list of Israeli ceasefire violations. In the past, Israel has broken cease-fire agreements while the media, particularly Western media, adopted an inverted narrative that blamed Palestinians for breaking the ceasefire. This is very important because it serves as justification for Israeli actions in the Western world obsessed with Israel's "self-defense."

The list we are keeping, as you can see, is quite long. Yet, if you read the New York Times article on the matter today, you'd never know of this context. Here is how Isabel Kershner covered the most recent exchange (emphasis mine):
In response to rockets fired from Gaza into southern Israel, apparently in support of the Palestinian prisoners, the Israeli military said it carried out an airstrike in Gaza late Tuesday night, its first since a ceasefire that ended eight days of fierce cross-border fighting in November. Warplanes struck two open areas in northern Gaza, causing no damage or casualties.  
Sami Abu Zuhri, a spokesman for Hamas, the Islamic militant group that controls Gaza, called the airstrikes a clear violation of the ceasefire. “We call on international parties to intervene immediately to end the Israeli escalation and also the violations against the prisoners,” he said in a statement.  
The rocket fire from Gaza was the third such violation of a ceasefire brokered by Egypt in November, evidence of its fragility.

Did you catch that? Yes, this has been the first Israeli air strike into Gaza since the truce but certainly not the first violation as our list clearly demonstrates. Israeli Naval fire, infantry fire and artillery have all been used in violation of the ceasefire before. Yet, the context provided by the reporter on fire from Gaza makes it seem like groups in Gaza are the more frequent violators of the truce. To make it worse, the reporter suggests the three projectiles from Gaza in four months are evidence of the fragility of the ceasefire.

In fact, "Israel has violated the ceasefire several times by firing on fishermen and farmers," according to this same newspaper.

So if three projectiles from Gaza in four months are evidence of the ceasefire's fragility, what is the long list of Israeli ceasefire violations evidence of? Well, two things. Israeli impunity and, in the case of this article today, poor journalism.
read more...

Feb 26, 2013

NY Times Watch: Getting Gaza Wrong... Predictably cc @Sulliview

When the ceasefire went into effect between groups in Gaza and Israel after an eight day bombing campaign just before Thanksgiving last year, I knew it would only be a matter of time before reports of the ceasefire being broken began to cross the wire. But I also knew that regardless of who fired first, when or how often, it would be the Palestinians who would be blamed for breaking the ceasefire. In 2008, The New York Times reported correctly the events of 4 November 2008 when an Israeli airstrike broke a ceasefire leading to the Israeli assault on Gaza named "Cast Lead." Yet when "Cast Lead" began, The New York Times' editorial ignored its own reporting stating at the time:
Israel must defend itself. And Hamas must bear responsibility for ending a six-month ceasefire this month with a barrage of rocket attacks into Israeli territory.
As the Israeli assault on Gaza last year commenced, the mainstream media also failed to properly contextualize it in preceding events.

That's why we put together a post in early December tracking Israeli ceasefire violations. We've continued to update it since. Do you think The NY Times ever reported these incidents in the context of breaking the ceasefire? Nope.

Yet, today, for the "first time in more than three months" Israeli security officials reported that a rocket from Gaza landed in Israel. The NY Times headline: "Rocket From Gaza Hits Israel, Breaking Ceasefire".

The absurdity of this reporting is exceeded only by its predictability. The story categorically states that this rocket violates the ceasefire in both the headline and the lede:
For the first time in more than three months, at least one rocket fired from the Gaza Strip landed in southern Israel early on Tuesday morning, according to Israeli authorities, breaking a ceasefire that had been in place after eight days of intense violence between Israel and Gaza last fall.

How does the author handle all the Israeli violations? She states that a Hamas lawmaker
accused Israel of violating the ceasefire first, citing several incidents in which Gazans have been shot near the strip’s borders with Israel and fishermen attacked at sea; the Israeli authorities have said their soldiers and sailors were only responding to efforts to breach the new limits set out in the ceasefire agreement.
There you have it. The notion that a projectile from Gaza breaks the ceasefire is presented as fact, which the author stands behind with her own voice, but the notion that Israel has violated the ceasefire persistently is presented as a he said/he said between a Hamas official and Israeli authorities. No doubt an American audience is conditioned to believe the Israeli version.

UPDATE: Time to give credit where credit is due. While the text of the blog post above accurately reflects the New York Times article as it first appeared, the Times has since edited the story. It is much shorter now. It no longer refers to the cease-fire in the headline or assigns blame on party in Gaza for breaking it but instead reads "Israel Struck by Rocket From Gaza After a Death". Further, its description of cease-fire violations by the parties is far more accurate:
The rocket, which came down on a road outside the city of Ashkelon and caused no injuries, was the first from Gaza to hit Israel in the three months since a cease-fire agreement ended eight days of cross-border violence. Israel has violated the cease-fire several times by firing on fishermen and farmers approaching newly relaxed security perimeters, but the agreement has otherwise held.
This is a far better representation of reality than what appeared earlier. Hopefully it is this version which made it into the print edition. Of course it would have been best had the Times reported on the Israeli violations when they occurred,  as they did with this single rocket, but nonetheless the updated version of this article is far improved. 
read more...

Feb 22, 2013

15 Questions for Emad Burnat

This weekend brings the Academy Awards, also know as the Oscars, a big weekend for Palestine this year. "5 Broken Cameras," the first-person documentary that chronicles Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation and settlement expansion in the West Bank village of Bil'in, is nominated for Best Documentary! Unfortunately, on his way to Hollywood, filmmaker Emad Burnat, his wife, and his eight year-old son were detained at LAX airport. They have since been released and are looking forward to an eventful weekend.

The Academy Awards has a list of questions for nominees which, once filled out, is then posted on its website. Here are Emad's answers about himself, his experience, his film and his hopes for the future.

read more...

Feb 20, 2013

And the Nominees are.........Detained at the Airport?

Bil'in is a village in the Israeli occupied Palestinian West Bank. It's also the home town of Emad Burnat and the subject of his Oscar nominated documentary "5 Broken Cameras." He headed to Hollywood this week to attend the Academy Awards.

Traveling in, out, and around Bil'in is difficult, as is traveling anywhere through the occupied Palestinian territory as a Palestinian, between roadblocks, checkpoints, segregation walls and the like. So you'd think the difficulties in Emad's journey from Bil'in to Hollywood would have ended after he made it out of Palestine.

Well, at least you'd think that is the case. It turns out that Emad, his wife and his 8 year-old son, Gibreel, who is also a subject in the film, were detained yesterday at the Los Angeles airport. Burnat, threatened with deportation, reached out to fellow film maker Michael Moore for help. Moore, in turn, notified the twitterverse.

"Apparently the Immigration and Customs officers couldn't understand how a Palestinian could be an Oscar nominee. Emad texted me for help," Moore tweeted.
Commendably, Moore got in touch with some attorneys and attempted to help. Burnat told Moore, "It's nothing I'm not already used to. When u [sic] live under occupation, with no rights, this is a daily occurrence." Burnat was ultimately released.

Burnat has just released a statement through his distributor Kino Lorber describing the events:
Last night, on my way from Turkey to Los Angeles, CA, my family and I were held at U.S. immigration for about an hour and questioned about the purpose of my visit to the United States. Immigration officials asked for proof that I was nominated for an Academy Award® for the documentary "5 Broken Cameras" and they told me that if I couldn’t prove the reason for my visit, my wife, Soraya, my son, Gibreel, and I would be sent back to Turkey on the same day.

After 40 minutes of questions and answers, Gibreel asked me why we were still waiting in that small room. I simply told him the truth: ‘Maybe we’ll have to go back.’ I could see his heart sink.

Although this was an unpleasant experience, this is a daily occurrence for Palestinians, every single day, throughout the West Bank. There are more than 500 Israeli checkpoints, roadblocks, and other barriers to movement across our land, and not a single one of us has been spared the experience that my family and I experienced yesterday. Ours was a very minor example of what my people face every day.
Burnat may be used to these sorts of procedures where rights are curtailed because of your ethnicity, religion or complexion while living under Israeli occupation. And while that is a sad reality, it shouldn't be the case. Nor should the oppression of Israeli occupation follow a Palestinian across the globe like a rain cloud wherever they go, especially not to the United States. This entire incident is an embarrassment and should be investigated. Why was an artist, his wife and their 8 year-old child treated this way? It doesn't make sense.

A number of media outlets have reported on the ordeal and while it is unfortunate, hopefully the silver lining will be that more attention is brought to a film intended to shed light on the draconian nature of Israeli occupation policies. Burnat rightly notes that these policies are far worse and far more extensive than what he had to endure on his way to the Oscars.

Raising awareness about them is a preliminary step to ending them. I'm glad he's finally made it to the Oscars and hope everyone can hear his story - a typically Palestinian one. 
read more...

Zionism = Colonialism, According to The NY Times

Yup, that's right. The paper of record, The New York Times, aptly described Zionism as a colonial movement. Shocked? Well, maybe it will make more sense when you consider that this article (NYT subscription needed) about Zionist organizing was written for the paper in 1899.

They were not shy about it either, check out the headlines:



Describing Zionism as colonialism today puts one outside the mainstream of thought and writing on the issue, and yet, a century ago, it was as mainstream as it gets. Why is that? Why the change? Did something fundamental change about Zionism?

No, what changed is the connotation of "colonialism." It became a dirty word. Or, as Joseph Conrad presciently wrote in the same year of this article's publication, "The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much."

It's not a pretty thing at all.

Early Zionist leaders self-described the movement as a colonial one. Of course, with the creation of the state of Israel, the depopulation of hundreds of thousands of native Palestinian Arabs, and the growing number of independent states emerging from colonial rule across the globe,  the association of a political movement with colonialism became a liability in a war of ideas taking place in an increasingly liberal global battlefield.

Ironically, and thanks to technology, as time has gone by it has become easier, not harder, to retrieve news articles on Zionism from this more candid, less PR-sensitive period. If this can contribute to a more candid present day discussion on the origins of conflict in Palestine it can be an invaluable contribution. 
read more...